Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 So. 2d 927 - Williams v. State

786 So. 2d 927 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust · 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Robertson-Ceco Corp. · 346 So. 2d 193 - Haskins v. Clary · Darville v. Texaco, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “| ^Universities have a duty to provide a safe campus and to act with a reasonable regard for the students’ safety. The presence of a security guard in a position where he can be seen by potential criminals has a deterrent effect on criminal activity in the area. Although a university also has a duty to implement reasonable measures to protect its students on the premises ■ from criminal acts, those criminal acts must be foreseeable.... Universities do-not stand in loco parentis — in the place of parents— to their students. Attempts to foster the educational process and the growth and maturation of the students have relieved universities of many of their protective duties. Modem college students are considered adults capable of protecting their own interests. They demand and receive increased autonomy and decreased regulation both on and off campus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the universities’ general duty to provide a safe campus and to act with reasonable regard for their students’ safety remained constant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.