786 So. 2d 962 - Daspit v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company · 625 So. 2d 1002 - Lasha v. Olin Corp. · Perniciaro v. Brinch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the medical bills are clearly connected to the accident at issue and where there is no substantial conflicting evidence to the contrary, testimony from Mr. Despit regarding receipt of the bills and treatment . . . is sufficient to allow the introduction of the medical bills in order to prove the cost of the treatment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“standard requires plaintiffs to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and also tends to preclude the trier of the facts from relying on evidence other than that of medical experts. Id. The proper standard is preponderance of the evidence. In the instant case, we find that the trial court's use of the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“holds plaintiffs to an artificially high standard, according to the Louisiana Supreme Court in Lasha v. Olin Corp., 625 So.2d 1002, 1005 (La.1993). The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.