Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 S.W.2d 396 - State v. Eaves

State v. Eaves’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Campos v. State · 138 Tex. Crim. 368 - Irven v. State · State v. Hancox · Wishnow v. State · State v. Alaniz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question is not whether the State has moved to amend a quashed charging instrument, but whether the charging instrument is subject to amendment. We do not read Hancox to require an attempt by the State to amend a quashed charging instrument as an appellate predicate in all cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “effectively terminated the prosecution and was therefore appealable by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.