Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 S.W.2d 504 - Grayson v. State

Grayson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 291st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cisneros v. State · Ridyolph v. State · Richardson v. State · Curlin v. State · Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant argues that the testimony was ... evidence of an extraneous offense[.] It is true that proof of extraneous offenses or transactions committed by a defendant are generally irrelevant to the contested material issues in the case on trial and are generally considered unjustifiably prejudicial ... [T]he evidence complained of came in as a result of the witness’ unresponsive answer to counsel’s question. The general rule is that an instruction to disregard will cure any unresponsive answer. Furthermore, there was no further mention of the subject, and the State made no attempt to pursue it. We hold the error, if any, was cured by the trial court’s prompt instruction to the jury to disregard the evidence for all purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.