Bullyan v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
787 F.2d 417 · 1986
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2019
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Califano v. Sanders · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Heckler v. Ringer · Erickson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]t any time if-- ... [it is] to correct clerical error or an error that appears on the face of the evidence that was considered when the determination or decision was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coates v. Bowen“involve[d] the same injuries, the same issues, and the same time period”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Kaemingk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.