Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 F.2d 439 - Thompkins v. Stuttgart School District #22

Thompkins v. Stuttgart School District #22’s Empirical Analysis

787 F.2d 439 · 1986

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp. (1995), United States v. Klubock (1987)

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

120198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Burford v. Sun Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “properly could have exercised jurisdiction over a state claim pendent to the ... Title VII claim”); Catania, supra, at 796 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.