Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 F.2d 510 - Smith v. Marsh

Smith v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

787 F.2d 510 · 1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
July 2014
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Martinez v. United States (2003), Blassingame v. Secretary of Navy (1987)

16 federal appellate · 7 district ·

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 1553 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401

Relies on Geyen v. Marsh · Hurick v. Lehman · Edward E. Oppenheim v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, Civil Service Commission · Bittner v. Secretary of Defense

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.