Celcom Communications Corporation of Georgia v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis
787 F.2d 609 · 1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Cellular Mobile Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · American Public Gas Ass'n v. Federal Power Commission · Cellular Mobile Systems of Illinois, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Celcom Communications Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is simply too late in the day to attack the comparative process itself or a comparative criterion which went unchallenged at the time it was adopted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Cellular Mobile Sys. of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. FCC, 782 F.2d 182 (D.C. Cir.1985) (“Pittsburgh”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.