Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 F.2d 834 - Hollander v. Brezenoff

Hollander v. Brezenoff’s Empirical Analysis

787 F.2d 834 · 1986

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2007

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

50198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78F (§ 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp. · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Cope v. Anderson · Vannier v. United States · Pauk v. Board of Trustees of the City University of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “create a contract cause of action for the benefit of providers, but simply sought to facilitate the processing and transmission of information by providers supplying services under the Medicaid plan”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.