Taylor v. Cate

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2015.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2015-06-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2016

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Kurt David Hermansen, Esquire, Law Office of Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Ronald Taylor, pro se.

¶3Linda Cheryl Johnson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Eric Eugene Reynolds, Deputy Attorney General, Office of *1242the California Attorney General, Los An-geles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶4ORDER

¶5THOMAS, Chief Judge:

¶6Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.