Taylor v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
787 F.3d 851 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Houston v. Lack · Pavelic v. Marvel Entertainment Group · Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“up for review any interlocutory order that ha[d] not become moot.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.