¶1concur, except on sanction. They believe the period of suspension is inadequate in light of respondent having lied directly to the client by saying the husband was demanding she pay him money to achieve a settlement when respondent knew the husband was not making such a demand.
787 N.E.2d 376
In Re Haughee
Decided May 5, 2003
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2003-05-05
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2005
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-05-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →