Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 NE2D 885 - State v. Starks

State v. Starks’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boufford v. Moore · In re Vey · State v. Holmes · Garling v. Indiana Department of Natural Resources · Stewart v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The proper remedy for the BMV's failure to explain Hammond's right of challenge is to allow Hammond the belated opportunity to challenge her HTV suspension on the merits, Were she successful at that, she might then petition for post-conviction relief in the court where she pled to the felony of continuing to drive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Starks's [habitual traffic violator] adjudication was invalid at the time of his [Harrison County] conviction, and therefore Starks's guilty plea was not supported by a factual basis. Thus, Starks is entitled to relief from this conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A person who operates a motor vehicle: (1) while the person's driving privileges are validly suspended under this chapter ... or (2) in violation of restrictions imposed under this chapter ... commits a Class D felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.