Overstreet v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Anders v. California · Batson v. Kentucky · Gideon v. Wainwright · Penson v. Ohio · Pennsylvania v. Finley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) determine that the defendant is unlikely to prevail on appeal; (2) file a brief indicating that he scoured the record thoroughly, and referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal; and (3) advise client of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief. The appellate court shall then make its own independent review of the record, in the manner followed in all other cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.