Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SO2D 1249 - Overstreet v. State

Overstreet v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Anders v. California · Batson v. Kentucky · Gideon v. Wainwright · Penson v. Ohio · Pennsylvania v. Finley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) determine that the defendant is unlikely to prevail on appeal; (2) file a brief indicating that he scoured the record thoroughly, and referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal; and (3) advise client of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief. The appellate court shall then make its own independent review of the record, in the manner followed in all other cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.