Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SO2D 127 - Acevedo v. State

Acevedo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 429 So. 2d 797 - Slomowitz v. Walker · 609 So. 2d 493 - Rodriguez v. State · Buie v. L. D. Johnson & Sons, Inc. · 641 So. 2d 1356 - Audano v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence must be found to be credible; the facts to which the witnesses testify must be distinctly remembered; the testimony must be precise and explicit and the witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to the facts in issue. The evidence must be of such weight that it produces in the mind of the trier of fact afirin belief or conviction, without hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to be established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there must be proof of a connection between the defendant and the collateral occurrences. In this respect mere suspicion is insufficient. The proof should be clear and convincing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.