787 So. 2d 130 - Mann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · 718 So. 2d 761 - State v. Hoggins · 589 So. 2d 933 - Lowder v. State · 572 So. 2d 1346 - Nowitzke v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to lay a foundation for the business record exception to the hearsay rule, it is not necessary to call the person who actually prepared the document. The record custodian or any qualified witness who has the requisite knowledge to testify as to how the record was made can lay the necessary foundation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osagie v. State“[t]he photographs and fire marshal's testimony show that there was a second fire, on top of the defendant's bunk. There is no plausible explanation for the second fire, and it was physically impossible for the second fire to have been set by accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.