Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 So. 2d 152 - Freeman v. State

787 So. 2d 152 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 699 So. 2d 822 - Viveros v. State · 774 So. 2d 934 - Valentine v. State · Puskac v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven though an unlawful entering or remaining in a structure is proved, if the evidence does not establish that it was done with the intent to commit an offense, the defendant must be found not guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “at the time of entering the structure Kenneth Freeman had a fully-formed, conscious intent to commit the offense of burglary in the structure,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “made it clear that the jury had to find an intent to commit theft along with an unlawful entry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.