Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SO2D 265 - Regan v. State

Regan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Stovall v. Denno · Linkletter v. Walker · Coker v. Georgia · Heggs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not compel an abridgement of the finality of judgments. To allow them that impact would ... destroy the stability of the law, render punishments uncertain and therefore ineffectual, and burden the judicial machinery of our state, fiscally and intellectually, beyond any tolerable limit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “because the rule contemplates a fact in the sense of evidence which is anything which tends to prove or disprove a material fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the law that warrant retroactive application under Witt from those which, in contradistinction, are mere”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.