Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

787 So. 2d 33

Melendez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-02-14

Relies on Heggs v. State · Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Centers, Inc.

Decided 2001-02-14

PER CURIAM.

¶1Nestor Melendez appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging that *34he is entitled to be resentenced under the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm without prejudice to any right Melendez might have to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

¶2Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.
/787/so2d/33 · .json · Public domain