Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

787 So. 2d 59

Haley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-02-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2002

2 state decisions

Relies on Heggs v. State · Clements v. State · Newsome v. Singletary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-02-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Randy Haley appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. In his motion, Haley alleged that he was sentenced as a habitual offender during the Heggs window and that his gain time was illegally reduced under chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, because Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), invalidated chapter 95-184 in its entirety. We affirm the order of the trial court. Appellant must first present his claim administratively to the Department of Corrections; if he is dissatisfied with the result, he can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county where he is incarcerated. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

¶2Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, Concur.
/787/so2d/59 · .json · Public domain