Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

787 So. 2d 61

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-02-28

Relies on Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Centers, Inc.

Decided 2001-02-28

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s order denying Christopher 0. Smith’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 is affirmed without prejudice to Smith’s right, if any, to file a rule 3.850 motion. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc) (affirming without prejudice to filing a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea based upon a plea agreement wherein petitioner received the bottom- of the 1995 guidelines).

¶2Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) J., concur.
/787/so2d/61 · .json · Public domain