Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 So. 2d 765 - Brooks v. State

787 So. 2d 765 - Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 940 So. 2d 389 - England v. State (2006), 918 So. 2d 181 - Brooks v. State (2005)

38 state decisions

27020012010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd · Richardson v. Marsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the other hand, trial courts must be cautious in not permitting unduly prejudicial or particularly inflammatory photographs before the jury.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Peede v. State · 73 So. 3d 155 - Armstrong v. State
  2. “A statement by a person who was a coconspirator of the party during the course, and in furtherance, of the conspiracy. Upon request of counsel, the court shall instruct the jury that the conspiracy itself and each member's participation in it must be established by independent evidence, either before the introduction of any evidence or before evidence is admitted under this paragraph.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Arguelles v. State · 156 F. Supp. 2d 1301 - Sanders v. Moore
  3. “`requires (1) that these statements be made during and in furtherance of a conspiracy, and (2) that independent evidence establish the conspiracy before the statements are allowed.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 967 So. 2d 1102 - Leigh v. State · 842 So. 2d 939 - Arguelles v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.