Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SO2D 834 - Latiif v. State

Latiif v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heggs v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 760 So. 2d 924 - Trapp v. State · 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · 708 So. 2d 617 - Maddox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[g]enerally, the relief granted to those entitled to it under Heggs is automatic resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the 1995 guidelines.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[The appellant] would be entitled to Heggs relief because his sentence constitutes a departure under the 1994 guidelines. This relief is not automatic, however, because the State gave up something as part of the plea agreement. "If the plea agreement is not binding upon the defendant, then it is not binding upon the state." Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54, 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.