Gilliam v. State

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction, but in accordance with the supreme court’s decision in State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, - So.2d -, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. March 22, 2001), we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resentenc-*977ing. We do not address appellant’s second issue, which was not preserved for review.