Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SW2D 417 - Osborn v. Kinnington

Osborn v. Kinnington’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 358th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Gutierrez v. Collins · Ogletree v. Crates · Hutzell v. Boyer · 57 Wis. 2d 588 - Hunker v. Royal Indemnity Co. · Saharceski v. Marcure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Abolition of Right of Action for Tort or Wrongful Death Recovery for tort or wrongful death will not be permitted in any state if the defendant is declared immune from such liability by the workmen’s compensation statute of a state under which the defendant is required to provide insurance against the particular risk and under which (a) the plaintiff has obtained an award for the injury, or (b) the plaintiff could obtain an award for the injury, if this is the state (1) where the injury occurred, or (2) where employment is principally located, or (3) where the employer supervised the employee’s activities from a place of business in the state, or (4) whose local laws governs the contract of employment under the rules of §§ 187-188 and 196. Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws § 184.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.