Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SW2D 582 - Koether v. Morgan

Koether v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2017

5 state decisions

30199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Proffer v. Yates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ection 11.06(j) [now section 155.207] indicates on its face that the legislature specifically contemplated the wisdom and necessity of such a transfer ... when custody of a couple's children is divided between the mother and father and one parent moves to another county with the children of whom that parent is managing conservator.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he clerk of the transferring court shall keep a copy of the transferred files. If the transferring court retains jurisdiction of another child who was the subject of the suit, the clerk shall send a copy of the complete files to the court to which the transfer is made and shall keep the original files.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re TJL
  3. “The statute does not require that all the children who have been subject to a court of continuing, exclusive jurisdiction in a particular case must live in the county to which a transfer is being sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.