Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 787 SW2D 705 - Pierce v. Serafin

Pierce v. Serafin’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Margoles v. Johns · Tube Turns Division of Chemetron Corp. v. Patterson Co. · 504 F. Supp. 1033 - Craig v. General Finance Corp. of Illinois · 413 F. Supp. 708 - Timberlake v. Summers · Texas American Bank v. Sayers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the defendant must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing a consequence in the forum state. Second, the cause of action must arise from the defendant’s activities there. Finally, the activities of the defendant or consequences caused by the defendant must have a substantial enough connection with the forum state to make the exercise of jurisdiction reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered in this Commonwealth, provided that the tortious injury occurring in this Commonwealth arises out of the doing or soliciting of business or a persistent course of conduct or derivation of substantial revenue within the Commonwealth[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.