State v. O'DELL’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Clark · State v. Wright · State v. Ford · State v. Taylor · Hardy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The issue of whether the admission of testimony which tends to bolster the testimony of a child victim of sexual abuse constitutes plain error has been decided in a number of Missouri cases. See, e.g., State v. Wright, 751 S.W.2d 48 (Mo. banc 1988); State v. Harper, 778 S.W.2d 836 (Mo.App.S.D.1989). “Absent a proper objection, the admission of evidence which may have the effect of ‘bolstering’ the testimony of a child victim is not see also plain error.” Harper , at 839; Wright, 751 S.W.2d at 53 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.