Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

787 S.W.2d 869

Dee v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1990

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1990-04-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1991

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-04-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate sentence We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/787/sw2d/869 · .json · Public domain