Frazier v. Heebe’s Empirical Analysis
788 F.2d 1049 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1654
Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Bolling v. Sharpe · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · Plyler v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lawyers admitted pro hac vice, who neither reside[d] nor maintain[ed] an office in Louisiana, fail[ed] to comply with the local rules and impede[d] the efficient administration of justice more than members of the bar of the Eastern District.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.