United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
788 F.2d 178 · 1986
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 2 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970)
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Enmund v. Florida · Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union · O. Hommel Company v. Ferro Corporation · Anchor Inns, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the tradition of this court that reported panel opinions are binding on subsequent panels. Thus, no subsequent panel overrules a published opinion of a previous panel. Court in banc consideration is required to overrule a published opinion of this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[O]nce a complaint has issued, the charging party is entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon its objections to the proposed settlement agreement, be it formal or informal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.