William Groseclose v. Michael Dutton’s Empirical Analysis
788 F.2d 356 · 1986
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Newsom v. Norris (1989), Peterkin H v. Jeffes H (1988)
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Cecere v. United States · Taylor v. Board of Education of the City School District of New Rochelle · Frederick L. v. Thomas · Hoots v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania · Grubbs v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“controlling factor [is] whether the order specifie[s] the nature, requirements and extent of the relief to be afforded by the plan to be submitted”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when important issues regarding the nature and extent of the relief ... still remain to be resolved and are dependent on the particular circumstances of the case as it would develop in the proceedings subsequent to the entry of the order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Armstrong · Armstrong v. Wilson“alter in a material manner the issues that would be presented to the court of appeals,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Armstrong · Armstrong v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.