Kevork Commission to Take Evidence Pursuant to Criminal Code of Canada and US Code and Federal Rules’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2024
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nardone v. United States · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Berger v. New York · United States v. Belfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person who is the target of an electronic surveillance or any other person whose communications or activities were subject to electronic surveillance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“FISA prohibits use or disclosure of evidence, obtained pursuant to its requirements, in a foreign criminal prosecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.