Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 788 F.2d 581 - United States v. Whaley

United States v. Whaley’s Empirical Analysis

788 F.2d 581 · 1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Gallop (1988), United States v. Iles (1990)

17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2273 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 661

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Barrett v. United States · De Leon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) timeliness of the motion; (2) adequacy of the court's inquiry into the defendant's complaint; and (3) whether the attorney-client conflict was so great that it resulted in a total lack of communication preventing an adequate defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.