OIP Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
788 F.3d 1359 · 2015
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 35 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 101
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Diamond v. Diehr · Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l · Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. · Bilski v. Kappos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At best, the claims describe the automation of the fundamental economic concept of offer-based price optimization through the use of generic-computer functions.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in other cases involving computer-related claims, there may be close calls about how to characterize what the claims are directed to. In such cases, an analysis of whether there are arguably concrete improvements in the recited computer technology could take place under step two”). .It is worth noting that relying on a computer to perform routine tasks more quickly,” like the reverse lookup at issue here,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.