Mintz v. Caterpillar Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
788 F.3d 673 · 2015
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Coleman v. Donahoe · Santamarina v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Simpson v. Beaver Dam Community Hospitals, Inc. · Smiley v. Columbia College Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding' for the enumerated reasons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“corroborating evidence that supports an inference of causation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daza v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.