State v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A
Relies on Flores-Figueroa v. United States · State v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits the offense of identity theft if the person fraudulently uses or attempts to fraudulently use identification information of another person, with the intent to obtain credit, property, services, or other benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A 'fraudulent' use requires Garcia know his use was illegitimate, but does not require him to know the identification was of another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.