Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 788 NW2D 111 - Vang v. State

Vang v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Robinette v. Price · In Re Welfare of IQS · State v. Parker · State Ex Rel. Knutson v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “certified to adult court, the record [did] not contain any subsequent adult court order convicting and sentencing Vang as an adult. Nor [did] the ... order contain any language suggesting that the judge believed he was sitting as the adult court when he convicted and sentenced Vang as an adult. While there is little doubt that the parties expected that Vang would be convicted and sentenced as an adult, it is equally clear the parties expected that it would be the juvenile court that convicted and sentenced Vang as an adult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.