Dobbins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Knaffla · Larrison v. United States · Leake v. State · State v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) The court is reasonably well satisfied that the testimony given by a material witness is false. “(b) ... [Without [the testimony] the jury might have reached a different conclusion. “(c) ... [T]he party seeking the new trial was taken by surprise when the false testimony was given and was unable to meet it or did not know of its falsity until after the trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dobbins v. State“(1) the court [is] reasonably well-satisfied that the testimony in question was false; (2) without that testimony the jury might have reached a different conclusion; and (3) the petitioner was taken by surprise at trial or did not know of the falsity until after trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A criminal defendant bears a heavy burden when seeking to overturn an indictment. The burden is heavier for a defendant who raises the issue on direct appeal after he has received a fair trial and been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hallmark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.