Beaulieu v. MacK’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jenness v. Fortson · American Party of Texas v. White · State v. Behl · City of St. Louis Park v. King · Jenkins v. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder Minnesota law, therefore, the petition itself must include enough information for election officials to determine that the candidate has presented sufficient signatures of individuals who reside within the district and would be eligible to vote for the candidate if nominated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“inspect the petitions ... to verify that there are a sufficient number of signatures of individuals whose residence address as shown on the petition is in the district where the candidate is to be nominated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.