Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 788 NW2D 899 - Paquin v. MacK

Paquin v. MacK’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1360 · 39 U.S.C. § 410

Relies on Snowden v. Hughes · Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones · Bryan v. Itasca County · New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe · Organized Village of Kake v. Egan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Petitioner] has the burden to prove that leaving his name off the ballot is an error that must be corrected under Minn. Stat. § 204B.44.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.