¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of Lawrence Hough’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice for Hough to file a timely and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea should Hough have the grounds to do so. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).
788 So. 2d 1009
Hough v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 2, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-02
Relies on Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Centers, Inc.
Decided 2001-03-02