State v. Watso’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Delva · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 576 So. 2d 1310 - Perkins v. State · 589 So. 2d 260 - Chiles v. CHILDREN A, B, C, D, E, AND F · 645 So. 2d 987 - B.H. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to uphold due process rights, penal statutes must be strictly construed according to their plain language. Perkins, 576 So.2d at 1312 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.