Vlahovich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 7, 2001

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2001-06-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2003

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 832 So. 2d 249 - State v. Smith

“as it relates to the petitioner's sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 832 So. 2d 249 - State v. Smith

Relies on Grant v. State · State v. Cotton · Ellis v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-06-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LEWIS, J.

¶1We have for review Vlahovich v. State, 757 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

¶2We partially quash the decision of the district court below only as it relates to the petitioner’s sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000). We approve the decision of the district court regarding the petitioner’s conviction for resisting arrest with violence.

¶3It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.QUINCE, J., dissents.