788 So. 2d 249 - State v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · Jones v. State · 786 So. 2d 532 - Mills v. Moore · Mills v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he evidence presented by Anderson was unknown at the time of trial and neither Mills nor his counsel could have discovered it with due diligence; the evidence would have been admissible at trial, if only for impeachment; and the newly discovered evidence, when considered in conjunction with the evidence at Mills' trial and 3.850 proceedings, would have probably produced a different result at sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.