Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 788 SO2D 565 - State v. Lovick

State v. Lovick’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Dorthey · State v. Weiland · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Louisiana courts have consistently held that a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment for second degree murder does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. State v. Graham, 422 So.2d 123 (La.1982), appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct. 2419 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983); State v. Pendelton, 96-367 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97) , 696 So.2d 144 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 ; State v. Hill, 98-1087 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99) , 742 So.2d 690 , writ denied, 99-2848 (La.3/24/00), 758 So.2d 147 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The reviewing court `does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.' Rather, the court must evaluate the evidence in a light most favorable to the state and determine whether the possible alternative is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Failing to articulate reasons for the sentence as set forth in La. C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, when imposing a mandatory life sentence is not error. The court has no discretion in imposing a mandatory life sentence and therefore setting forth the factors considered in imposing sentence would be an exercise in futility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.