Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 788 SO2D 752 - Puckett v. State

Puckett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Clemons v. Mississippi · United States v. Eichman · Shell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Our supreme court] has stated on numerous occasions that a trial court's determinations under Batson are afforded great deference because they are largely based on credibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In reviewing an alleged Batson violation, [an appellate court] will not reverse factual findings relating to a Batson challenge unless they are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.