788 So. 2d 822 - Wilner v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Wood v. Worachek · 618 So. 2d 1252 - Womble v. Singing River Hosp. · Frank v. Dore · 455 So. 2d 793 - Red Enterprises, Inc. v. Peashooter, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under the `freely given where justice so requires' standard, Wilner should have been allowed to amend her complaint and to test her claim on the merits since even the few facts given appear to present a proper subject for relief. Estes v. Starnes, 732 So.2d 251, 252 (¶ 4) (Miss.1999). The motion to amend was filed within the statutory time allowed and should have been granted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“any undue prejudice caused by the allowance of Wilner's amended complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilner v. White“leave [to amend] shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilner v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.