King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McFee v. State · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 607 So. 2d 1171 - Jenkins v. State · 608 So. 2d 314 - Butler v. State · 536 So. 2d 1314 - Corley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The remarks made by the State in closing attacked [the defendant's] lack of evidence and not his failure to testify. A conviction will not be reversed due to an improper remark during closing argument unless this Court is convinced that the remark influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict. In the present case, we are not convinced that the comment by the district attorney served to prejudice the jury and influence the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.