Arcila v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 204th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brown v. Illinois · Cruz v. Hauck · Parham v. Cortese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the evidence supports the conclusion that appellant's consent was freely and voluntarily given, thereby rendering admissible the evidence seized pursuant to that consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arcila v. State“This [the determination that appellant's arrest was illegal] does not mean, however, that the evidence was necessarily admitted improperly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arcila v. State“that any coercion flowing from the illegality of appellant's arrest was dissipated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arcila v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.